PLEASE WATCH THIS. I HAVE ATTEMPTED TO UPLOAD ON YOUTUBE AND WAS BANNED MULTIPLE TIMES. THIS VIDEO WILL OPEN YOUR MINDS AND EYES TO SO MUCH THAT YOU NEVER KNEW. WATCH IT BEFORE IT IS BANNED AGAIN. THIS VIDEO SHOWS YOU JUST WHAT YOUR LIFE MEANS TO THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Hard Topics
Controversial talk in a proper manner, where we take the hard topics, try to break them down, and gain an understanding.
SHARE MY POSTS
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
Friday, August 14, 2015
ALMOST 20 YEARS AND STILL NOT FREE....The Innocence of Aaron Finley.
***I recommend you read the article in this
link before proceeding. ( http://www.mississippi-justice.com/Aaron-Finley----In-His-Own-Words.html )***
Today’s
news is based in the city of Meridian, Mississippi in the year of 1994. Yes,
over 20 years ago. The murder of George
Monsour took place in 1994. I discovered this story on social media a month ago
and was instantly fascinated and had to know the truth. There are many twists
and turns and injustices with the court system in this discovery, so take your
time and read this and the links provided.
The
murder and Robbery of George Monsour took place on November 16, 1994 and sure
did shake up the town. It was stated that Mr. Monsour had been shot and robbed
and three suspects were taken into custody, by the names of Willie Davis and
Aaron Finley, and Stacey Armstrong. Aaron Finley and Stacey Armstrong were released in
1995 after not being indicted three times due to lack of evidence, but Willie
Davis remained incarcerated and convicted of the murder of George Monsour. In
April of 1996 Aaron Finley was indicted for capital murder for the beating and
drowning of George Monsour. Willie Davis made a deal with the district Attorney
to testify against Aaron Finley to have his sentence be life in prison instead
of the death penalty.
The
trial of Aaron Finley was unusual and took some turns for the worse. Originally
offered 10 years as a plea, Aaron turned it down, claiming innocence. In 1996
during Aaron Finley’s trial he was appointed two lawyers and a paralegal to
help the lawyers on the case. The paralegal being, Tammy Cogdell and the
lawyers being, Susanne A Merchant and Roger Druett of whom is now dead. Roger
Druett is now deceased and the Susan A Merchant stopped practicing law in
Meridian, I am not sure of the location of Tammy Cogdell. On one of the days of
his trial the paralegal was crossing the street to go back to the law office
when a car hit her, and broke her leg. The paralegal was sent to the
hospital but survived. I am told that the person who hit her had purposely
done it and left the scene, and it turns out that the driver was the grand daughter of Mr.
George Monsour and no charges were filed and no questions were asked. This left
his lawyers with one less on their defense and also shaken up and in fear of
what could happen to them. Aaron Finley’s defense asked for recess until the
next day but was denied by the judge.
During the trial
There
were a few people there to testify against Aaron Finley. Rita Crane who now
owns Crane Employment of Meridian claims to have been driving down the
interstate and saw Aaron in the back seat of the stolen car of Mr. Monsour and
Willie Davis driving which led her to believe Aaron was part of the murder. The
car was a 1964 Chevrolet Impala and Aaron Finley was allegedly in the back seat.
A reliable source stated that the speed limit on that interstate is 60 MPH and
that If Aaron was in the back seat a person would have to be able to see
through the back panel to see him. They
also stated that they don’t think she had anything against Aaron its just that
her brother was a law man and she only wanted to help but she still lied.
1964
Impala example (Notice Back panel blocking view of passengers)
Also
stated from a source is that Willie Davis’s testimony and statements changed
numerous times, which should have made all of his statements of no use. Also a woman claiming that someone by the
name of Willie Davis tried to buy a car part form her but upon seeing Aaron she
said that he didn’t look the same, which proves it wasn’t him but actually
Willie that asked her for a car part.
The scene of the crime was said to be
near a lake and on the day of the crime would have been very muddy. The shoes
of Aaron Finley were confiscated but no soil tests done although his shoes were
still clean with no traces of mud, which proves him to not be at the crime
scene. Also the alibi of Aaron Finley states that at the time the murder was
said to have taken place he was at Perfection Cleaners (owner: William Doug
Fort) delivering his clothes to be cleaned. There was a ticket made and should
have been in the possession of the cleaners but my sources state that the
Detectives never went to get it from them. I am told that if that ticket is
still available and can be obtained it would prove the innocence of Aaron
Finley.
Also sources reveal that upon finding Mr.
Monsour at the scene of the crime his items, which would be in his wallet, were
all thrown around the scene and not one of the items contained Aaron Finley’s
fingerprints but did contain someone’s prints, which were never revealed. As a
matter of fact the only place Aaron’s fingerprints showed up on was the
passenger side of the vehicle in which he admits to riding in but only after
Willie Davis picked him up to ride after the murder of George Monsour, which
Aaron was unaware of. To Aaron’s knowledge Willie Davis purchased the car. This
is all stated in his story.
The
jury deliberated for hours and finally reached a verdict and found the
defendant Aaron Finley Guilty of the murder of George Monsour based on only the
statements of others and no proof of actual murder. Although it took hours to
find him guilty it took no time for the jury to ask that he be given life
without the possibility of parole. This leads me to believe some kind of deal
was made during deliberation between the jurors.
A
reliable source tells the story from their perspective, stating that Willie
Davis is kind of mentally ill and that his story has changed every time he is
asked. Their story is that Stacy Armstrong along with Willie Davis killed Mr.
Monsour. Willie was threatened by Stacy Armstrong to not testify on him, so Willie
Davis added Aaron to his story out of fear for Stacy Armstrong. And as far as
Tommy Goree, they stated that everyone feared him and wouldn’t dare say
anything. The source stated that Aaron Finley was victim to being involved with
the wrong people at the wrong time and didn’t know anything of the murder.
Legal
advice was given to help in this case from an attorney which is to get a
transcript of the trial and look for any inconsistencies, all the evidence
presented and not presented. Also gaining that ticket from the cleaners would
also be a big help.
I
have read the story and researched it with so many people that were involved in
the case and I am convinced that Aaron Finley is innocent of Murder and was
only a passenger along for a ride after the murder of George Monsour. I also
believe he had no knowledge of the murder until after the police wanted him for
questioning and he turned himself in to prove his innocence. I feel like if a
person killed someone and was offered 10 years they would take it, but if
innocent they would fight until the end. I could go on and on with the inconsistencies and errors in this case but you get the point. Here it is almost 20 years after his
conviction and incarceration and still no justice. He should be granted a re
trial that is fair and presents all the evidence. I say that all key people in
the case come forward and speak nothing but the truth from the heart not what
they think they should say.
If
you have any information pertaining to this case please leave a comment. And if
you have legal advice for him or have a way to help here is his personal
address:
Aaron Finley #66987
M.C.C.F. A2 bed #61
833 west St.
Holly Springs, MS 38635
Aaron
Finley
-Aaron Finley’s case # 325-96
-Willie Davis’s case # 439-95
Links to Petitions:
Mississippi Justice Project:
In his own words:
Steven Hayne (Medical Examiner):
Willie Davis going against his plea agreement:
**Write them on his behalf asking for justice**
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Was the Civil War About Slavery?
I found this video to on the Civil War and its reasons for it being fought. It is an interesting watch and also you could fact check it by looking up the Declaration of Secession for each state of the confederacy.
Sunday, July 26, 2015
WHAT SHOULD WE DO WITH THIS FLAG???
Media
around the states have been constantly debating over the Confederate flag and
if it should be taken down, and if it is a hate symbol? I have taken the time
to do some research and managed to learn some new things. My research also led
me to a new question that maybe only a few know the answer to.
I
grew up never knowing what this symbol meant and rarely saw it. The only time I
remembered it was from the Dukes of Hazard show, it was painted on the top of
their car. With that being said I have no biased opinion in this matter and
will only use the information I research and try and view it from different
perspectives.
My
search for information lead me first to an article written on CNN's website.
Now I'm skeptical when it comes to media sources but the article titled,
“Confederate battle flag: separating the myths from the facts” (www.cnn.com)
drew my interest and left me with even more questions than before. Then began
my history lesson.
My next stop was the website of
Encyclopedia Britannica and the article titled, “Flag of the Confederate states
of America”. (www.britannica.com/). Here
I found that during the Civil War in 1861 through 1865, the Confederate states
adopted a national flag on March 5, 1861. This flag was called “stars and bars”
and had two red and one white horizontal stripes with seven white stars on a
blue background in the left corner which the stars equal the amount of states
that seceded and as more states seceded more stars were added.
This
flag posed a problem because it looked too similar to the unions flag. In
November 1861 the second national flag was created and featured a square
variation of what we call the Confederate battle flag or the Southern Cross
today, on a white rectangle background and was called the “stainless banner”.
This flag was made official on May 1, 1861.
This
too posed a problem because on a day that was not windy it resembled a flag of
surrender. On March 4, 1865 a vertical red stripe was added to the white
background of the “stainless banner” design of 1863.
This
research still left me wondering how did the variation we see today come about?
Then the thought hit me about the Dukes of Hazard, it was displayed on their car,
which was called the General Lee. CNN’s article states that certain units of
the Confederate Army flew the variation we see today and the most famous was
Gen. Robert E Lee’s unit of Northern Virginia. Though the variation we see
today was never official some units, of the Confederate Army, used it.
CNN
goes on to state that it didn't become famous until 1948 during James Strom
Thurmond’s presidential run. This information took me back to Encyclopedia
Britannica's article on Strom Thurmond (www.britannica.com/)
who turns out to be a segregation advocate and of the Democratic Party, but
later left the Democratic Party to be a reelected as a Republican US Sen. in
1964 until 2003. CNN states that during his presidential election in 1948 his
supporters called the “States Rights Democratic Party”, also known as the
“Dixicrats” and his fans greeted him with Confederate battle flags. Also stated
is the Dixicrats’ purpose, which was support of segregation of races, in
article 4 of its platform. (www.cnn.com)
After his death it was discovered that he fathered a child by an
African-American woman who was 16 years old and he was 22.
This
information attracts the question, does this flag represents segregation?
Whether it was coincidence or own purpose, as desegregation advanced the flag
became more and more popular with the states.
My
next question was who designed the first flag to carry this symbol known as the
Southern Cross, which appeared on the second official flag of the confederacy
known as the stainless banner? My research led me to William Tappan Thompson
who cofounded the Savannah Morning News in the 1850s. Thompson was a supporter
of the Democrats and was against the granting of civil rights to
African-Americans. He also was a supporter of the confederacy during the Civil
War and helped design the second national flag that contains a variation of the
battle flag says Wikipedia. (Wikipedia.org/)
“As
a people we are fighting to maintain the heaven-ordained supremacy of the white
man over the inferior or colored race; a white flag would thus be emblematical
of our cause. - Thompson, William T.
(April 23, 1863) “Daily Morning News. Savannah, Georgia.
“… as a national emblem, It is
significant of our higher cause, the cause of a superior race… - Thompson, William T. (May 1863) “Daily
Morning News. Savannah, Georgia.
The
statements made by Thompson plainly show the flag’s purpose of creation and
what it means is white supremacy. But somehow I felt that wasn't enough and
furthered my research. Let's go back to the Civil War and view some of the
states that wanted secession and why. To figure this out we need to view those
states’ Declaration of Secession. I checked out Civil War trust at (CivilWar.org)
and first shown was Georgia who states slavery as a cause, but Mississippi
states it as their main cause in the first sentence.
“Our
position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the
greatest material of interest of the world.”
- Mississippi Declaration of Secession.
South
Carolina’s secession states, “but an increasing hostility on the part of the
non-slaveholding states to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard
of their obligations… adopted December
24, 1860.
Texas’ secession also focused on
the protection of slavery
My
research has led me to the conclusion that firstly this flag known as the
Southern Cross whom the masses are arguing and fighting over was never really
official or a national flag. Also its meaning upon creation was to push a white
supremacist agenda. Most of the people, who adopted it, show it as a symbol of
hatred, segregation, and racism. The Confederate states declaration of
secessions show that one of their main purposes was to keep the African
American race in bondage as slaves.
You argue that it is heritage or
tradition and my conclusion is yes it is, of violence and hate. It has a long
history of violence, hate, and inequality. Also this flag represents treason
against the United States of America being it represents a separation from the
union.
So, my opinion of should it stay
or should it go? Yes! Take it down. It is very offensive and represents hate
and treason, not to mention a lost war. Should it be in museums or similar
places? That is the perfect place for it, because it is history but make sure
you tell the story right. Also should people be allowed to have them on their personal property? Yes, they have the freedom to express their beliefs. If we allow others to express their true feelings we then know their true selves and know if we should be associated with them or not.
I also end this with stating,
that taking it down will not fix the problem in America. The problem in America
is much bigger than this piece of fabric. I also believe this will open the
eyes of many Americans to see we have a major problem and that hatred and racism
must be addressed. The systematic Racism is what needs to be taken down.
Resources
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)